Comment AI training engagement. (Score 1) 35
Using AI is training AI to replace you. If you can be replaced with AI, you will be, and should be.
If you don't use AI, your peers will be, and you will be replaced by AI anyway.
Good Luck
Using AI is training AI to replace you. If you can be replaced with AI, you will be, and should be.
If you don't use AI, your peers will be, and you will be replaced by AI anyway.
Good Luck
Lying to yourself is the biggest danger for trying to stay Anonymous. With enough patterns to recognize, the idea that one can hide is a delusional take.
The only way to win, is to run EVERYTHING you post through an AI that changes the tone and words used in all your online activity. But even then that may itself be a lie.
It's Not Enough to "Caution Against".
That language is TOO PASSIVE.
The correct and appropriate phrase is "HELL NO" and start tossing out 1st, 4th, 5th amendment claims IN COURT.
I read that and was simultaneously laughing and angry. I'd call it a load of horseshit, but that would be insulting to horseshit.
What a bunch of windbaggery. Meaningless, feckless corporate speak.
We know. They know we know. We know they know we know. They don't care.
Nothing says "fuck you" like a "well worded" press release. It was only missing the AI EM-DASH.
Climate is notoriously complex set of wild interactions that are unknown at best. Predictions of climate crisis have always been wildly off, because the goal is to scare people into action.
But the boy who cried wolf is a cautionary tale that climate people failed to learn.
It is a feature, not a bug!
But hey, lets claim incompetence and not malice even though they are indistinguishable at this point.
We're now charging PREMIUM for our new ProAudiophile(tm) MUD interface. Guaranteed or your money back!
You forgot the obligatory "Get Off My Lawn!"
And yes, BUTTONS and DIALS are best for drivers.
The alternative is voice and steering wheel controls, but I don't like either as much as dials and actual buttons.
"Progress!!!!"
They are training their replacement.
Just a wild ass guess though, but knowing efficiencies are always driven from the top, this is the primary likelihood.
1) the USA is bigger than all of EU geographically. Seattle to Miami is about the same distance as London to Tel Aviv Israel.
2) Population Density. The US has huge swaths that are less dense. Between LA and SF, is basically farmland with some cities here and there. The HSR is being built right in that corredor and this is the BEST we have so far
3) Unions. The whole project was largely created as a make work program for Unions at prevailing wage. Which feeds the (D) party coffers exclusively.
4) Democrats. Democrats run the state. They can't blame R for anything. But they do anyways.
We have "high speed rail". They are called Airplanes. For the cost of the HSR project, California could buy every man/woman/child at least 10 Round Trip flights between any two CA airports. This does not include the cost of the train tickets, which are largely expected to exceed plane tickets for the same trip.
Unfortunately, trains have some sort of emotional capture with a group of people who don't care about such things like costs, because they are covered by taxpayers.
I can almost guarantee that the cost of this will spiral out of control and take way longer to complete than they are telling you right now.
CA High Speed Rail, was supposed to be done by now, it doesn't have a single working section, and has already ballooned its expenses. But here we are, throwing good money after bad, instead of cutting it off.
it wasn't politics as you said, it was a legal status. The politics was fought in DC, by elected representatives. A lot of stupid laws in place, compliance isn't politics, it is survival.
The reason it is alive today, isn't in spite of itself. It is alive because it is exactly what it has ALWAYS been.
Functions exactly as it should.
Hasn't chased bigger metrics.
Hasn't deviated from core goals/values.
Provides service as advertised (pun intended).
Stayed out of politics.
The perfect role model for business longevity.
Just don't F it up by going AI.
It's sarcasm.
It is literally every talking point that beats around the bush about why kids aren't learning.
They aren't learning because we're spending more time fixing everything BUT why they aren't learning.
What we need is more social programs. We need more anti whatever training because kids are disproportionally affected by something or another. The overweight kids need more food because obviously they are starving or something. And also, more after school programs and later start times for schools because reasons. For all this, we need more administration and testing for our students so that we can know more about what they aren't learning in pretty reports and stuff. And tech, we need more distracting tech because they don't get enough with their phones.
And taxes, we need to pay more because all these programs aren't free.
Maybe THEN we'll tackle illiteracy.
*I'm in IT for Education. Schools aren't teaching kids because the schools are distracted by everything but educating kids. Oh, they'll claim they are "trying". My dad used to say "Trying is a noisy way of doing nothing".
Help stamp out Mickey-Mouse computer interfaces -- Menus are for Restaurants!